26 Jun 2009 Supreme Court says girl’s forced blood transfusion didn’t violate rights
Posted at 14:44h in Blog, Fundamental Freedoms, Legal Cases 0 Comments
Canada’s top court on Friday dismissed the case of a Manitoba girl — a Jehovah’s Witness — who said her rights were violated when she was forced to get a blood transfusion against her will because she was a minor. In a 6-1 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that such medical interventions are constitutionally sound. [Keep reading this story here.]
Enjoyed this article?Never miss an article!
Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed about everything ARPA!