21 Dec 2009 “Religious Orientation” before the Ontario Courts
here.]
Aside from the fact that the complainant in this case has expressed same gender attraction, the case has nothing to do with sexual orientation. The situation Ms. Heintz found herself in would have occurred if she had been involved in a heterosexual relationship outside of marriage, substance or resident abuse, or any other potential violations of the Christian Horizons community’s Lifestyle Policy. This case is about “religious orientation.” [Read the whole articleEnjoyed this article?
Never miss an article!Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed about everything ARPA!
No Comments